Síndrome de intolerancia a múltiples medicamentos / Syndrome of intolerance to multiple medicines

El síndrome de intolerancia a múltiples medicamentos (MDIS, por sus siglas en inglés) se caracteriza por la intolerancia a dos o más medicamentos no relacionados. Tiene una prevalencia baja y es común en pacientes con polifarmacia. A pesar de que las reacciones adversas a los medicamentos son muy frecuentes, es raro que los pacientes debuten con este síndrome, el cual tiene implicaciones clínicas de leves a graves que afectan su vida; de acuerdo con esto varían el abordaje y su manejo. La sintomatología presentada varía desde síntomas gastrointestinales como reflujo gastroesofágico, dolores musculares y cefalea, hasta síntomas cutáneos; estos son los más frecuentes, tales como urticaria y erupciones maculopapulares o presentaciones menos comunes como el síndrome de Stevens-Johnson. El MDIS es causado por una amplia variedad de fármacos; por ello el conocimiento del síndrome, así como un adecuado interrogatorio de los antecedentes del paciente, es necesario para realizar un diagnóstico oportuno e instaurar un manejo adecuado y preventivo, evitando reacciones adversas que pongan en riesgo su vida. Con los hallazgos del cuadro clínico en la paciente, y basados en los antecedentes alérgicos presentados anteriormente a diferentes medicamentos no relacionados entre ellos, más la presentación de un rash maculopapular generalizado posterior a la administración de trimetoprim/sulfametoxazol se realiza el diagnóstico de MDIS. Se decide cambiar de medicamento por fosfomicina, con una consecuente evolución favorable. (AU)

Association between desloratadine and prednisolone in the treatment of children with acute symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial / Associação entre desloratadina e prednisolona no tratamento de crianças com sintomas agudos de rinite alérgica: ensaio clínico duplo-cego, randomizado e controlado

Abstract Introduction: A combination of antihistamines and oral corticosteroids is often used to treat acute symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Objective: To evaluate safety and efficacy of desloratadine plus prednisolone in the treatment of acute symptoms of children (2-12 years) with allergic rhinitis, and to compare it to dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone. Methods: Children with moderate/severe persistent allergic rhinitis and symptomatic (nasal symptoms score [0-12] ≥ 6) were allocated in a double-blind, randomized fashion to receive dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone (n = 105; three daily doses) or desloratadine plus prednisolone (n = 105; single dose followed by two of placebo) for 7 days. At the beginning and end of the evaluation, the following were obtained: nasal symptoms score, extra nasal symptoms score, peak nasal inspiratory flow, blood biochemistry, and electrocardiogram. Ninety-six children of the dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone group and 98 of the desloratadine plus prednisolone group completed the protocol. Results: The two groups were similar regarding initial and final nasal symptoms scores, extra nasal symptoms scores and peak nasal inspiratory flow. A drop of 76.4% and 79.1% for nasal symptoms score, 86.0% and 79.2% for extra nasal symptoms score, as well as an increase of 25.2% and 24.3% for peak nasal inspiratory flow occurred for those treated with desloratadine plus prednisolone and dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone, respectively. There were no significant changes in blood chemistry. Sinus tachycardia was the most frequent electrocardiogram change, but with no clinical significance. Drowsiness was reported significantly more often among those of dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone group (17.14% × 8.57%, respectively). Conclusion: The desloratadine plus prednisolone combination was able to effectively control acute symptoms of rhinitis in children, improving symptoms and nasal function. Compared to the dexchlorpheniramine plus betamethasone combination, it showed similar clinical action, but with a lower incidence of adverse events and higher dosing convenience.

Resumo Introdução: A associação entre anti-histamínicos e corticosteroides orais é frequentemente empregada no tratamento de sintomas agudos de rinite alérgica. Objetivo: Avaliar a segurança e eficácia da associação desloratadina + prednisolona no tratamento de sintomas agudos de crianças (2-12 anos) com rinite alérgica e compará-las com as da associação dexclorfeniramina + betametasona. Método: Crianças com rinite alérgica persistente moderada/grave e sintomáticas (escore de sintomas nasais [0-12] ≥ 6) foram alocadas de modo duplo-cego e randômico para receber dexclorfeniramina + betametasona (n = 105; três doses diárias) ou desloratadina + prednisolona (n = 105; dose única seguida por duas de placebo) por 7 dias. No início e no fim da avaliação foram obtidos: escore de sintomas nasais, escore de sintomas extranasais, pico de fluxo inspiratório nasal, bioquímica sanguínea e eletrocardiograma. Do total, 96 crianças do grupo dexclorfeniramina + betametasona e 98 do grupo desloratadina + prednisolona concluíram o protocolo. Resultados: Os dois grupos foram iguais com relação ao escore de sintomas nasais, escore de sintomas nasais extranasais e pico de fluxo inspiratório nasal iniciais e finais. Observou-se queda de 76,4% e 79,1% nos escores para escore de sintomas nasais, de 86,0% e 79,2% para escore de sintomas extranasais, assim como incremento de 25,2% e de 24,3% para o pico de fluxo inspiratório nasal para os grupos desloratadina + prednisolona e dexclorfeniramina + betametasona, respectivamente. Não houve alterações significativas da bioquímica sanguínea. Taquicardia sinusal foi a alteração do eletrocardiograma mais encontrada, mas sem significância clínica. Sonolência foi significantemente mais referida entre os tratados com dexclorfeniramina + betametasona do que entre os desloratadina + prednisolona (8,57% × 17,14%, respectivamente). Conclusão: A associação desloratadina + prednisolona foi capaz de controlar efetivamente os sintomas agudos de rinite em crianças, melhorou sintomas e a função nasal. Na comparação com a associação dexclorfeniramina + betametasona, demonstrou ação clínica semelhante, mas com menor incidência de eventos adversos e maior comodidade posológica.

Efficacy of montelukast and loratadine as treatment for allergic rhinitis in children.

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of montelukast combined with loratadine once daily to loratadine alone for a 2-week treatment course of allergic rhinitis in a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial which enrolled 115 children, 6- 15-years-old. The patients were randomly assigned to receive montelukast and loratadine (treatment group) or placebo and loratadine (control group). The primary outcome was the mean percent change of the total daytime nasal symptom scores (PDTS) and secondary outcomes were the mean percent changes of the nighttime nasal, daytime eye and composite symptom scores (PNTS, PES, PCS), as well as the nasal secretion, turbinate swelling and nasal congestion scores (PNSS, PTSS, PNCS). There were no significant differences in the PDTS of the 2 groups. The change in the night time nasal congestion score (PNTS-congestion) was higher in the treatment group, but not statistically significant (p = 0.077). Only the mean percent change in decreased turbinate swelling was significantly greater in the montelukast and loratadine group than the loratadine alone group (-22 +/- 7 vs. -1 +/- 5, p < 0.05).

Neurotrophins: are they meaningful in chronic spontaneous urticaria?

Plasma neurotrophin levels are elevated in patients with allergic and autoimmune diseases. The present study was designed to investigate the serum neurotrophin levels in 42 patients displaying chronic spontaneous urticaria, as well as 22 healthy control subjects. Blood samples were obtained from subjects during their first visit to the clinic, and then again after one month of desloratadine therapy. No significant difference was found between patient and control groups in terms of basal serum neurotrophin levels. However, basal nerve growth factor levels in patients whose symptoms persisted despite treatment were significantly lower than those of the drug-responsive patients and the control group. In treatment-responsive patients, nerve growth factor increased after suppression of the symptoms. Our study suggests that chronic spontaneous urticaria is linked with changes serum nerve growth factor levels, and that the deregulation of neurotrophins may contribute to urticaria pathophysiology.

A randomized controlled trial of cetirizine plus pseudoephedrine versus loratadine plus pseudoephedrine for perennial allergic rhinitis.

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of cetirizine plus pseudoephedrine (C+P) with loratadine plus pseudoephedrine (L+P) in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. This was a double blind, randomized, parallel trial with an active control. Subjects aged 12 to 70 years with perennial allergic rhinitis for at least 2 years were enrolled and randomized to receive either of the active study medications plus a placebo resembling the other, twice daily for 4 weeks. Nasal total symptom scale (NTSS) including sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal itching and nasal stuffiness is evaluated by subjects daily and at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks by the investigator as efficacy measurement. A total of 51 eligible patients were enrolled and 45 patients completed the treatment course. Both groups had significant reductions in NTSS after 4 weeks of treatment as assessed by the subjects, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean +/- SD) reduction of 4.25 +/- 2.45 with C+P vs. 3.52 +/- 2.41 with L+P, p = 0.215. As assessed by the investigator, sneezing was significantly better at 2 weeks (-1.13 vs. -0.52, p = 0.028) and nasal congestion at 4 weeks (-1.71 vs. -1.19, p = 0.031) in subjects treated with C+P compared to those treated with L+P. There were 37 treatment-related adverse events (5 in 4 subjects in the C+P group and 32 in 16 subjects in the L+P group). It was concluded that both cetirizine plus pseudoephedrine and loratadine plus pseudoephedrine are efficacious for perennial allergic rhinitis in Taiwanese subjects. Relief of sneezing and nasal congestion may be marginally better with the cetirizine preparation, which also seemed to be slightly better tolerated, although the incidence of side effects did not differ significantly.

A comparative study of the side effects between pseudoephedrine in Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables and loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet in treatment of allergic rhinitis in Thai patients.

The objective of the study was to evaluate the adverse reactions of Loratadine plus Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Repetabs Tables (LTD+PSE Repetabs) (Loratadine 5 mg + Pseudoephedrine 120 mg) twice daily with that of loratadine (5 mg) twice daily and pseudoephedrine (60 mg) quarter daily in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis. The study was designed as an investigator-blind, parallel group study. In this study, 56 patients were equally separated into 2 groups and treated for 14 days with either LTD+PSE Repetabs or loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet. Both groups were comparable in age, gender, weight; baseline systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. The change of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate did not reach clinical significance throughout the study period. There was no significant difference in occurrences of insomnia, palpitation, mouth dryness and anxiety. However, the incidence of patients with tremor at day 14 in the loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet group was significantly higher than the LTD+PSE Repetabs group (39% vs 10.7%, p-value = 0.03). Furthermore, one patient in the loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet group had to discontinue medication at day 7 due to insomnia. In conclusion, LTD+PSE Repetabs is well tolerated and has fewer adverse effects when compared to the loratadine + pseudoephedrine tablet.

Therapeutic efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup in childhood atopic dermatitis treated with mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream.

Atopic dermatitis is a common skin disease in Thai children. The treatment of atopic dermatitis requires topical corticosteroids, emollients, systemic antihistamine as well as avoidance of the precipitating factors. A double blind multicenter placebo controlled study was conducted to assess the therapeutic efficacy of topical mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream in combination with loratadine syrup. Forty-eight patients, 23 boys and 25 girls, mean age 73.67 months, with atopic dermatitis were included in the study. The severity of the disease was measured by using the SCORAD index including the degree of erythema, dryness, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, lichenification, and excoriation. Total area involved was measured and a target area of dermatitis was selected for specific evaluation. The degree of clinical signs and pruritic symptom was graded. The sensation of pruritus, disturbance of sleep due to pruritus, and feeling of sleepiness in the morning were recorded. Mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream was applied to all patients once daily. One group received loratadine syrup and another group received placebo syrup. They were followed-up on day 5, 8 and 15. The severity of atopic dermatitis and pruritus significantly decreased after 14 days of treatment in both groups (p < 0.001). There was no difference in therapeutic response between the loratadine and placebo groups (p = 0.99). All signs examined had decreased by the end of the study. The result demonstrated that 0.1 per cent mometasone therapy is very effective for treating childhood atopic dermatitis. Loratadine did not show beneficial effect when combined with good topical corticosteroid but it was safe and had no serious side effect on the children.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized study of loratadine (Clarityne) syrup for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in children aged 3 to 12 years.

Allergic rhinitis is a common disease in children, and antihistamines are the key medication. However, traditional tablets are not convenient and lead to low compliance in young children. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of loratadine syrup for the treatment of children aged 3 to 12 years with allergic rhinitis. Sixty children with allergic rhinitis due to dust mites were enrolled. They were randomized into 2 parallel groups: one group received loratadine syrup 5 mg or 10 mg daily for 3 weeks, and the other group received placebo. The patients returned to special clinics for symptoms evaluation at day 7 and day 21, and the parents were requested to record disease severity daily. Both evaluations, physician's and parents', were recorded with a 4-point scale for 5 symptoms: sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and ocular symptoms. Forty-six patients completed the study, 22 in the loratadine group and 24 in the placebo group. At the initial visit, the total symptom score (TSS) in both groups was not significantly different (p = 0.39). The TSS of the loratadine syrup group at day 7 and day 21 was lower than those of the placebo group (p = 0.003, p = 0.06). The daily card scores in the experimental group were also significantly lower than those of the placebo group (week 1, p = 0.014; week 2, p = 0.029; week 3, p = 0.014). No adverse reactions were recorded in both groups. This study revealed that loratadine syrup 5 mg or 10 mg once a day improved symptom scores of children with allergic rhinitis effectively and safely.

La Loratadina: Su eficacia en el tratamiento del asma infantil atópico en comparación con el Ketotifeno / Atopic children asthma. The Loratadine

Se presenta un trabajo donde se estudia la acción del antinflamatorio y antialérgico Loratadina, en el tratamiento del asma infantil atópica moderado por hipersensibilidad a antígenos de dermatophagoides (pteronisimus y/o farinae) hogareños en comparación con otro de acción similar pero de eficacia comprobada: el Ketotifeno...Más del 80 por ciento de resultados satisfactorios en ambos grupos se estableció al comprobarse los porcentajes de desaparición o disminución significativa del número de crisis y de los síntomas o signos de obstrucción entre ellas, normalización o mejoría sifnificativa de las pruebas funcionales y de la tolerancia al ejercicio, supresión o reducción significativa de la medicación concomitante y 0 por ciento de síntomas de intolerancia y/o toxicidad y la conservación normal de la curva de peso

Evaluación comparativa del astemizol-pseudoefedrina y loratadina-pseudoefedrina en niños con rinitis alérgica / Evaluated comparative the effectiveness and safety of astemizole-pseudoephedrine to loratadine-pseudoephedrine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Se realizó un estudio con el propósito de evaluar la eficacia y la tolerancia de la solución astemizol-pseudoefedrina en comparación con el jarabe loratadina-pseudoefedrina en el tratamiento de la rinitis alérgica. Se incluyeron 50 niños de uno y otro sexo (34 varones y 16 mujeres) de edades entre 2 y 7 años que se asignaron al azar a cada grupo. Los pacientes se evaluaron antes, a los 3 y los 7 días de tratamiento. Los niños tratados con astemizol-pseudoefedrina obtuvieron mejores resultados, con efectividad promedio de 48 por ciento contra 64 por ciento de loratadina-pseudoefedrina. La diferencia fue significativa a favor de astemizol-pseudoefedrina para los síntomas oculares según las evaluaciones del médico y para la obstrucción y el prurito nasal y el estornudo según el diario del paciente. Ambos medicamentos comenzaron su acción antes de 30 minutos de administrados; a las 4 horas 38 por ciento de los pacientes del grupo tratado con astemizol-pseudoefedrina refirieron alivio contra 16 por ciento del grupo loratadina-pseudoefedrina. Un paciente del primer grupo y tres del segundo presentaron efectos secundarios

Eficacia e inocuidad de loratadina vs terfenadina en el tratamiento de niños con rinitis alérgica perenne: capacidad para inhibir la respuesta cutánea positiva después del tratamiento antihistamínico / Efficacy and innocuity of loratidine vs terfenadine in the treatment of children with perennial allergic rhinitis

Se estudiaron 104 pacientes (estudiantes de la Facultad Medicina de la UANL), con síntomas de rinitis alérgica perenne de los que sólo se seleccionaron 30; siete pacientes se trataron con loratadina 10 mg, ocho con loratadina 20 mg, 15 con terfenadina 120 mg por día durante 21 días. Tanto la loratadina a 20 mg como la terfenadina 120 mg demostraron una reducción estadisticamente significativa (P> 0.0005) en el control de síntomas. Dos pacientes informaron que tuvieron reacciones adversas con terfenadina, por lo que abandonaron el estudio. La terfenadina fue más eficaz que loratadina en la disminución de la reactividad cutánea

Loratadina vs terfenadina en rinitis alérgica perenne: capacidad para inhibir la respuesta cutánea / Loratadine vs terfenadine in perenneal allergic rhinitis

Se estudiaron 104 pacientes con síntomas de rinitis alérgica perenne de los que se seleccionó a 30. siete se trataron con loratadina 10 mg, ocho con loratadina 20 mg, 15 con terfenadina 120 mg por día durante 21 días. Tanto loratadina 20 mg como terfenadina 120 mg demostraron una reducción estadísticamente significativa (P) en el control de los síntomas. Dos pacientes tuvieron reacciones adversas con terfenadina y abandonaron el estudio. La terfenadina fue más eficaz que la loratadina en la disminución de la reactividad cutánea